Current Fuel Surcharge - $10 per pallet. For more information click here

Contact Us

Fill out the form below to request more information from our Bladensburg location.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form

View our privacy policy

MD: Bladensburg

(301) 927-8300

4700 Annapolis Road, Bladensburg, MD 20710, USA

Mon-Fri 6:30AM to 4:00PM Saturday 6:30AM to 12:00PM Sunday CLOSED

Get In Touch with someone at MD: Bladensburg
(301) 927-8300

"*" indicates required fields

Accepted file types: pdf, txt, Max. file size: 2 MB.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Response time within 4 hours

Data Misses on Embodied Carbon

Aaron Fisher | June 30, 2024

There is significant urgency to avoid, reduce, or even reverse the emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2e) to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. With the climate emergency bearing down, its clear that we need to address large sources of emissions and the building sector is a large element. The problem is that the initially presented data often came with an agenda to sell one product over another. As it’s been aptly put: “a lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on.”

In looking where to focus the U.S. Department of Energy developed a document entitled Decarbonizing the U.S. Economy by 2050: A National Blueprint for the Buildings Sector. Much of the document details where federal action and coordination can lead to success in addressing climate goals. One of these goals is “Minimize Embodied Life Cycle Emissions” which is looking at the energy it takes to produce the materials that make up a building. However, this section begins by noting that, “accurate estimates of embodied emissions from the national buildings sector are not currently available.” To first understand a problem you must measure and understand it. We have not done this.

The section goes on to note that while this needs to be done, it is unclear that this strategy has somewhere between 0.4% and 11% impact on our global emissions. While it settles on a value of 4% it is clear that this remains quite unsettled. And while important enough to not wait for the initial baseline, it’s critical that we understand the scale of this problem to best balance where we spend our limited resources.

There are a lot of ideas on ways to reduce the embodied carbon of materials, and certainly every little bit helps. But a lot of the smoke being blown is by the wood sector who isn’t being entirely truthful/forthcoming about their own environmental footprint.

 

VP of Business DevelopmentAaron Fisher

Phone
Location
MD: Bladensburg
Languages
English

Latest News

Saving on School Construction

Saving on School Construction

A new school is a big financial and community investment. It makes a community more attractive to students, teachers, families, […]

Read More
Insurance: Impacted by Material Choices

Insurance: Impacted by Material Choices

With the increased risk of disasters and the cost of construction; insurance costs are up. But, they aren’t going up […]

Read More
Wastefully Fixing Traffic Barriers

Wastefully Fixing Traffic Barriers

On I-495 and I-270, MDOT has been stapling Steel W-Beam Barriers to crumbling concrete barriers.Ā What happened to these barriers? And […]

Read More
Building for Tomorrow, Today

Building for Tomorrow, Today

Every building or structure has a designated lifetime: 30 years, 50 years, 100 years. However what happens when the conditions […]

Read More