Current Fuel Surcharge - $15 per pallet. For more information click here

Contact Us

Fill out the form below to request more information from our Bladensburg location.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form

View our privacy policy

MD: Bladensburg

(301) 927-8300

4700 Annapolis Road, Bladensburg, MD 20710, USA

Mon-Fri 6:30AM to 4:00PM Saturday 6:30AM to 12:00PM Sunday CLOSED

Get In Touch with someone at MD: Bladensburg
(301) 927-8300

"*" indicates required fields

Accepted file types: pdf, txt, Max. file size: 2 MB.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Response time within 4 hours

Single Stairwell: A Fire Failure

Aaron Fisher | April 28, 2026

Recently a lot of jurisdictions have been considering and passing rules to only require 1 stairwell in multifamily residential buildings. Requiring each unit to have access to 2 stairwells has not only been best practice, it’s been code. Why? Safety.

Supporters of this regulation stress that removing a stairwell reduces the cost of housing and enables significantly different layouts. This is true. Building less building means costs are reduced, and reducing access requirements does open alternative design options.

They often go on to stress that this is standard practice in Europe. BUT, this is where code has been written in blood.

European construction is inherently different than American construction. Where we use wood and timber for structures, they predominantly use concrete and masonry. In the event of a fire, this is the game; one burns, the other does not.

Furthermore, two stairwells are preferred by fire departments. It allows them to use one stairwell to save people, and the other to fight the fire. Fire is chaotic, before having to worry if grandma’s wheelchair is going to roll over the hose.

Often when a building is wood, the fire department’s plan is simply to wait and attack from a distance. Running into a burning structure that is at risk of collapsing, endangers the lives of occupants and the fire fighters. No need to double up on misery.

If the structural material is non-combustible, sure consider a single stairwell. But the wood lobby is pushing this and not yoking these two ideas together.

So while the structure may cost less to build, the risk to property and human life is significantly higher with a single stairwell. Risk is already priced into the system as insurance. Insurers know this and charge more for what appears to the untrained eye to be the same structure. So while we reduce first costs, we are NOT reducing total costs. And this is NOT affordable housing.

VP of Business DevelopmentAaron Fisher

Phone
Location
MD: Bladensburg
Languages
English

Latest News

Building for Tomorrow, Today

Building for Tomorrow, Today

Every building or structure has a designated lifetime: 30 years, 50 years, 100 years. However what happens when the conditions […]

Read More
Better Defining Affordable Housing

Better Defining Affordable Housing

Affordable housing is a rallying cry for politicians of all stripes. Having a safe place to put your head down […]

Read More
Fuel Surcharge Information

Fuel Surcharge Information

Dear Valued Customer,   Our concrete block and bagged cement products prices will increase by five percent (5%) on May […]

Read More
Passive vs Active Fire Resistance

Passive vs Active Fire Resistance

Buildings are susceptible to fire. Structural materials, furnishings, and decorations can, and often are, made out of combustible materials. There […]

Read More