Rebar Alternatives Save Big $$$

Contact Us

Fill out the form below to request more information from our Bladensburg location.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

View our privacy policy

MD: Bladensburg

(301) 927-8300

4700 Annapolis Road, Bladensburg, MD 20710, USA

Mon-Fri 6:30AM to 4:00PM Saturday 6:30AM to 12:00PM Sunday CLOSED

Get In Touch with someone at MD: Bladensburg
(301) 927-8300

"*" indicates required fields

Accepted file types: pdf, txt, Max. file size: 2 MB.
Response time within 4 hours

Key to Fiberglass Rebar Success- Bond Strength

Aaron Fisher | January 23, 2024

Concrete by itself is great under compression, but weak under tension (about one-tenth as strong). This becomes a problem in concrete construction, to which there are two basic ways to address:

  1. Plain Concrete-The Romans got around this problem by thickening their concrete—the walls of the Pantheon are 20 feet thick. This makes for a lot of material and heavy structures (read: expensive), but functionally works quite well.
  2. Reinforced Concrete– A composite material—meaning it is a combination of two materials—consisting of concrete and reinforcing bar. Add in steel reinforcement, which has good tensile strength and voila you have a single building material with compressive and tensile strength. As you are probably well aware, this is the preferred strategy of modern construction.

Reinforcing material has largely been focused on steel, because there are few materials that could compete on performance (tensile strength), price, and availability. Until now.

Bring on the Fiberglass

The introduction of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP or fiberglass rebar) has led to materials that have significantly higher tensile strengths (2x-3x) that are competitive on price, and widely available compared to black steel. With these benefits codes (ACI 440.11-22, IBC 2024) have been quickly adopted that allow the engineer to choose between steel and fiberglass for the reinforced concrete.

However, in the drive to get the highest tensile strength, we have overlooked the key element that because reinforced concrete is a composite material these two materials need to work together. They need to be bonded to each other. We aptly call this value: Bond Strength.

A Detour on Deformation

When concrete was first being reinforced into steel, the two materials had weak bond strength.  Contractors used to take smooth steel rod and twist it in the field to get higher bond strength. Manufacturers quickly realized the challenge of this method, and introduced integral deformations (basically roughened surfaces). This increased the steel’s bond strength 10x, and the rest is history…

Being a smooth material, GFRP inherently suffered the same problem and manufacturers started to relearn this. First by roughening the surface with sand, and then by introducing their own integral deformations. But these values differ greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer as in Table 1.

Table of Bond Strength to Concrete (sources at bottom)

Bar Average Bond Strength (psi) Range Bond Strength (psi)
MST Bar 3,100 3000-3300
Deformed Steel 2,175
VROD 2,029
Galen 1,475 1100-2000
GatorBar 1,400 1400
PinkBar+ 1,300 1100-1400
Mateenbar 1,160 1160
GFRP Code 1,100
Plain Steel 290

One Bar to Bond Them All- MST Bar

Only 1 manufacturer has been able to recognize this marker in the sand and beat steel: MST Bar. Their bar’s bond strength is 50% higher than steel; and nearly 200% higher than the code minimum. Simply put it yields a better reinforced concrete. Bond strength is so high, that MST Bar-reinforced concrete performs in a class by itself.

Designing with High Bond Strength

Accounting for the higher bond strength to concrete, yields further benefits:

  • Embedment lengths can be reduced
  • Lap lengths can be reduced
  • Reduces (and often avoids) the need for adhesive or bent anchors bars
  • Reduction in crack width
  • Better fire resistance
  • As a non-corroding material: Epoxy coating (and the concomitant loss of bond strength) can be ignored; Rusting and the breaking of the bond can be ignored.

Ready to Step Up to MST Bar Fiberglass Rebar? Shop our E-Store Today



Shunmuga Vembu, P.R.; Ammasi, A.K. A Comprehensive Review on the Factors Affecting Bond Strength in Concrete. Buildings 2023, 13, 577.

American Concrete Institute. Recommended Practice Guidelines for FRP Bars in Pre-Engineered Projects. MNL-6(23)

American Concrete Institute. 2017 ACI FRP Composites Compteition: Reinforcement Identification Guide and Product Datasheets.

VP of Business DevelopmentAaron Fisher

MD: Bladensburg

Latest News

The Mirage of Carbon Capture

The Mirage of Carbon Capture

The impact of CO2 and other greenhouse gases on climate change is undeniable. To address this issue, the allure of […]

Read More
Sealing PaveDrain

Sealing PaveDrain

Salt is an important ingredient in…food and some drinks! It has also been utilized for years to help melt snow […]

Read More
Bond Beam Vs. Masonry Lintels: Distinguishing The Components

Bond Beam Vs. Masonry Lintels: Distinguishing The Components

In the realm of construction, understanding the nuances of various components is crucial for ensuring the durability and stability of […]

Read More
Understanding The Price Of Split-Face Block

Understanding The Price Of Split-Face Block

Split-face block is a type of architectural concrete masonry unit that is both functional and decorative. They have a rugged, […]

Read More